Packers coach Matt LaFleur should heed a warning flag from a recent player survey, and fast. The question isn’t just about a single season’s stumble; it’s about what the locker room signals for the future, and whether leadership can bridge the gap to a Super Bowl-winning culture.
Clear issues, visible signs
Green Bay’s late-season fade and a 1-4 playoff record since 2020 raise legitimate concerns about sustained excellence. The team’s performance metrics in 2025 show room for improvement, even though there were promising individual efforts. The NFLPA grading of coaches adds another layer, suggesting that some players feel the offense and game-management didn’t maximize their potential, even before isolating blame on any one coordinator.
What the surveys suggest and what they don’t
The publicly discussed grades imply a perception gap between players and leadership, particularly around the offensive staff. However, some insiders caution that survey responses can be biased—disgruntled players may be more motivated to respond, and a few late-season collapses can color overall evaluations. Still, when the defensive coordinator and special-teams coach earned high marks while the head coach and offensive coordinator did not, it signals areas that deserve attention, not dismissal.
Leadership, staff, and culture under the microscope
LaFleur faces a pivotal year with substantial talent on the roster. The departure of Rich Bisaccia, the special-teams coordinator, sparked speculation about internal disagreements, though officials described the move as personal. This context matters because leadership dynamics shape not only play-calling and schemes but also day-to-day culture and accountability across units.
The offense and how to move forward
The coaching staff’s mix and play-calling approach will be under heavy scrutiny. With the offense finishing mid-pack in several key categories, there’s a case for re-evaluating personnel and strategy. While LaFleur may have confidence in his system, the team could benefit from fresh perspectives or different influences to spark improved consistency and finish.
What happens next and why it matters
Going into 2026, the Packers must translate talent into reliable execution, especially in tight game situations. The goal is to prevent the backslide that plagued late-season stretches and playoff outcomes. If the organization wants to prove its long-term commitment to LaFleur, this season is where measurable progress—on both offense and culture—will be judged.
If you agree that leadership needs to adapt to win, or you think stability is the key, share your take in the comments: should the Packers shake up the staff, or trust that the current plan can deliver a deep playoff run? And what specific changes would most effectively address the concerns raised by the player survey and late-season performances?
